Rhea Myers - Ex-Machina: A History of Generative Art London Wednesday, July 13, 2022 | Phillips

Create your first list.

Select an existing list or create a new list to share and manage lots you follow.

  • From 2011 to 2012 as the "Shareable Readymades" project I commissioned the awesome artists Chris Webber and Bassam Kurdali to create three 3D printable models of commonplace objects - a urinal, a balloon dog, and a pipe - that had become part of canonical art history. The artists retained copyright on their work and the results were placed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license with the attribution to myself as the person that commissioned the work. I did this in order to critique the production of neoconceptual art by artists such as Jeff Koons and the processes by which art history cordons off models of commonplace objects as signature works by Jeff Koons, Marcel Duchamp and others.

    Furtherfield Gallery in London (who meta-commissioned the Balloon Dog model) exhibited the works with "certificates of inauthenticity" that I détourned from Sol LeWitt's certificates for his wall drawings. Then at the #BlockchainLive18 show, also in London, Ruth Catlow and Dr. Charlotte Frost of DECAL and Furtherfield produced gold castings of the Balloon Dog model and registered the resulting "Cryptopuppers" on Arteia's blockchain art registry.

    I hadn't planned these developments, but they diagonalized the project in interesting ways. The former recapitulated conceptual art's capture by the very systems of sale and ownership that it had initially sought to escape. The latter mapped this onto the constant development of techno social phenomena within successive waves of Andy Cameron and Richard Barbrook's essay "Californian Ideology" by taking a 3D printing project that was meant to be free-as-in-freedom and making an expression of it exclusively ownable with cryptographic certainty on the blockchain.

    As "Rare Art", blockchain token-based digital editions have become the latest expression of ownership of value that would previously have escaped capture. The technology of blockchain-based digital certificates of "ownership" of digital art images was initially developed ironically ("Rare Art" comes from "Rare Pepe" trading cards). It was then captured by startup capital that cannot explain its contradictions. In its Rare Art iteration, Ethereum ERC-721 Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) for digital image URLs are presented as solving the problem that digital art is infinitely reproducible and therefore cannot be sold as a rare asset. They establish authentic provenance and ownership where this was not previously possible.

    It is difficult to represent off-chain truth on-chain, however. It is prohibitively expensive to put bitmapped digital images on-chain. And it is impossible to make sure that a digital image is represented uniquely even within the same smart contract on a single blockchain. This means that we must trust the claim that the image represented by each ERC-721 token is what its creator claims. The authenticity of Rare Art images is threatened by "piracy", where an artist's images are copied from one Rare Art platform to another and sold without their consent. It is also threatened by "trash art", where the art produced is an undeclared auto-tracing or other mechanical transformation of stock images. Artists who feel entitled to the monetary and reputational value of the art they produce regardless of the method used and collectors who feel entitled to react simply to the price of Rare Art tokens are clashing over matters of authenticity in platforms that were supposed to render such questions moot.

    Why not turn this risk into value and make a virtue of inauthenticity?

    To make the link between off-chain truth and the problem of authenticity explicit I have created a Rare Art edition of Certificates of Inauthenticity for the Shareable Readymades series. If you own one of these tokens, you can prove that I have not made the instance of Urinal, Balloon Dog, or Pipe that you have 3D printed or placed in virtual reality (which the CC-BY-SA license on the work gives you full permission to do). Print out the certificate that you own the NFT for and display it proudly in a physical gallery, or display it as a digital image on a virtual wall.

    Then, if anyone questions the authenticity of the art that you are displaying and your right to own it, you can answer them that the art is provably inauthentic and that you have no more ownership of it than anyone else. And that you know this to be true with all the cryptographic certainty of the blockchain. —Rhea Myers


    Further Information on NFTs


    In what currency will I be bidding?

    The auction will be conducted and invoiced in British Pounds (GBP).


    What forms of payment are accepted?

    You can pay for this NFT Lot in GBP or in Ether. If you wish to pay for this NFT Lot in  Ether you must satisfy the Cryptocurrency Conditions set out in our Additional Conditions of Sale applicable to Cryptocurrency Payments.


    You acknowledge and agree that the price of Ether can be volatile and subject to upward and downward movements. You acknowledge that the conversion rate between these Accepted Cryptocurrencies and GBP will change during and after the auction until the Lot is paid for. Phillips does not offer cryptocurrency conversion functionality during the auction.  Bidders are responsible for making their own currency conversion calculations when bidding in the auction.


    How much will I have to pay?

    If you are the successful bidder on an NFT Lot, you must pay the total purchase price for the Lot (calculated as described in the Conditions of Sale plus network and other fees required to transfer the NFT to your Digital Wallet Wallet as described in the Additional Conditions of Sale Applicable to NFT Lots).
    If you elect to pay for an NFT Lot in Ether and satisfy our Cryptocurrency Conditions (see above), the GBP purchase price as shown on your invoice will be converted automatically into Ether using the Coinbase Commerce rate of exchange at the time the buyer accesses the Coinbase Commerce platform to make payment using the QR code or link we will issue to you.


    Are resale royalties payable to the artist on re-sales of the NFT?

    If resale royalties are payable to the artist on subsequent resales of the NFT, this will be stipulated in the NFT Lot’s smart contract.  Where they exist, re-sale royalties will be a percentage of the re-sale price of the NFT. It is therefore important that you review (or seek professional help to review) and understand the operation of the NFT’s smart contract (including any rights and restrictions contained in the smart contract) before bidding.


    Depending on where the NFT Lot is re-sold, additional artist resale royalties and transaction duties may apply to the transaction under applicable law. These would be additional to and not in substitution for any resale royalties imposed by the NFT’s smart contract.



    • You are bidding for yourself and not on behalf of anyone else

    • If you are the successful bidder, you will be buying the NFT only.  You will not be buying the digital artwork asset identified by the NFT.  For further details please read the Additional Conditions of Sale for NFT Lots

    • You have a wallet capable of supporting and accepting the NFT token type listed in the NFT Lot description

    • You can only pay for the Lot in Ether if you satisfy the Cryptocurrency Conditions set out in our Additional Conditions of Sale applicable to Cryptocurrency Payments. These include requirements for you to make payment:

      • from a single digital wallet registered in your name maintained on one of the following platforms:

        • Coinbase Custody Trust;

        • Coinbase, Inc.;

        • Fidelity Digital Assets Services, LLC;

        • Gemini Trust Company, LLC; or

        • Paxos Trust Company, LLC;

      • using funds obtained from legal activities and belonging to you. 


    We cannot accept cryptocurrency payments:

    • from digital wallets hosted on other exchanges or self-hosted wallets;

    • from multiple digital wallets; or

    • if you are resident in or otherwise subject to the laws of a country or territory which has banned or restricted payments in cryptocurrency (such as the People’s Republic of China);or 

    • you fail to satisfy our client identification and verification checks or other vetting procedures; or

    • other circumstances exist which would expose you or Phillips to potential legal or regulatory actions or fines by completing the transaction in cryptocurrency.

    If we cannot accept payment from you in cryptocurrency for these or other reasons, you must make payment in GBP.
    For the full terms and conditions which apply to the sale of this Lot, please read the Conditions of Sale for Online Only London Auctions, the Additional Conditions of Sale applicable to NFT Lots, the Additional Conditions of Sale applicable to Cryptocurrency Payments.

    • Provenance

      The artist



Lot offered with No Reserve

Certificate of Inauthenticity: Urinal (10 of 11)

Token ID32
Contract Address0xe63c...4603
Non-Fungible TokenERC-721
PNG: 1.37 MB (1,439,559 bytes), 6600 x 5100 pixels
Minted on 16 May 2020, this work is number 10 from the edition of 11.

Full Cataloguing

£8,000 - 10,000 

Contact Specialist

Benjamin Kandler
Project Lead for Digital Art, Phillips
+44 7393 141 146

Alexis Chompaisal
NFT Manager


Ex-Machina: A History of Generative Art

Online Auction 13-20 July 2022