Approaching a white relief by Camargo, we are dazzled by its aura. We only gradually penetrate back from the work, through the cognitive process, to the central meaning.
Guy Brett, 1966
Untitled (Relief No. 347), 1971, is exemplary of Camargo’s penchant for confronting the limits of modernity both aesthetically and philosophically. Composed of diagonally-cut wooden cylinders set atop a flat wooden board, the all-white reliefs provide a kinetic experience indebted at once to historical Constructivism and the minimalist monochromes of his predecessors and mentors Lucio Fontana, Yves Klein and Constantin Brancusi. Cognizant of his peers’ struggle to rid themselves of prewar perspectives that were no longer relevant, Camargo engaged in formal experiments with volume and space, abandoning representation as he constructed what would become his signature wood reliefs. In so doing, the artist radicalized the concept of structural objectivity as it had been known and set in motion a new dialogue on spatial relationships rooted largely between the materiality of the wood cylinders and the conceptual space they project.
“In his long series of reliefs and sculptures he goes back again and again to the same constructive paradigm—a cylinder or cube and the ways it may be cut and combined—and the more he explores it, the more he articulates all its possibilities, the more he undermines its status as a paradigm, as ‘law’, making us question the sort of stability and finality we invest in paradigms. The most subtle thing, perhaps, is that Camargo does not investigate this paradox in an ideal conceptual realm but in light, in the changing light of the everyday world with its incalculable complexity of nuance.” (G. Brett, “A Radical Leap”, Art in Latin America, Ed. Dawn Ades, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989, pp. 270-275)
By 1971, Camargo’s reliefs had achieved their formal apex: the carved wooden cylinders, projecting at a multiplicity of angles, create a stunning puzzle through an exchange of light and shadow around each module. The quiet of the monochromatic white surface comes into direct contrast with the frenzied patternless forms that protrude from it. The dichotomy is symptomatic of the artist’s meditations on balance and chaos, order and disintegration.
This philosophical perceptiveness in tandem with Camargo’s experimental spirit permeates the entirety of his artistic production. Camargo understood his reliefs as intellectual products that were conscious reflections of the world in which they were created and historically situated there within. In the midst of widespread violence, political oppression, philosophical uncertainty and technological innovation, Camargo, like other artists, sought to redefine what the concept of art-making truly meant. While the sculptural reliefs acknowledge the precedents of his mentors, from the Argentines Fontana and Pettoruti to the Europeans Klein and Brancusi, this explicit awareness and hybridization of forms distinguishes the work both in concept and in form and engages a new dialogue with the generation of artists that would follow.